It may be a big national issue with more than enough to read from the big boys, but some of the local guys have interesting points of view on the port deal.
Joe Guarino got on the issue the same day Director of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff dropped the story on the Sunday morning TV talk circuit. He
doesn't think much of the deal as presented by our D of HLS.
David Boyd has two posts on the topic.
One questions whether Democrats and the left can argue against the sale without being accused of profiling foreigners.
The other raises serious doubts about whether GW Bush stands on any solid ground if he vetoes congressional legislation that stops the deal.
Sam Hieb comes to
some conclusions about prospects of political battle after linking to the NY Times story on the from Dubai with love saga. He predicts Bush will fight to get the deal through even if he has to face down conservatives and other Republicans.
Ed Cone provides a
variety of links covering the Rumsfeld connection and the veto possibility. He also links to an article that mentions the historical tie between protectionism and racism in America.
Turning to the airwaves, Allen Handleman
had a good segment on his FM Talk 101.1 show this afternoon. No security experts or bonified talking heads were needed. The portion I heard contained nothing but even-handed and reasonable discussion between Handleman and his callers. The show continues to impress me.
I'm a bit torn on the issue. I think this story started rolling much faster than the Bush administration anticipated. It has to be explained why the deal will not be a security risk to not only his base, but also to what I think is a signficant number of Americans who would like to love Bush a little more while they still contribute to his negative performance ratings. There's also a chance to engage opponents in reasonable discussion.
However, this is not all on Bush. Democrat and Republican opponents must make a case that the sale of the port to a UAE-based company compromises national security. It will be interesting to see if the Democrats can avoid stereotyping Arab businesses in making its case. Republicans will have to prove they possess surperior wisdom to Bush on matters of national security. A tall order, I think.
I appreciate the story because it has plenty of the elements of political theater. (Have John McCain or Joe Biden found a microphone or reporter yet?) Part of it is a struggle between the legislative and executive branches and between the executive branch and state governments. It also has yet to be determined if the issue becomes more political or if it is a security concern deserving of the highest priority. Finally, I think the American public is out there looking at both sides of the issue. It is fascinating watching serious issues of national security having to navigate the stormy waters of free poltical debate.